| Title |
Hospital organizational context and delivery of evidence-based stroke care: a cross-sectional study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Implementation Science, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13012-018-0849-z |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nadine E. Andrew, Sandy Middleton, Rohan Grimley, Craig S. Anderson, Geoffrey A. Donnan, Natasha A. Lannin, Enna Stroil-Salama, Brenda Grabsch, Monique F. Kilkenny, Janet E. Squires, Dominique A. Cadilhac |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 18 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Australia | 7 | 39% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 11% |
| Canada | 2 | 11% |
| Colombia | 1 | 6% |
| Curaçao | 1 | 6% |
| Unknown | 5 | 28% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 10 | 56% |
| Scientists | 6 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 6% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 6% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 87 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 87 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 12 | 14% |
| Researcher | 10 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 6 | 7% |
| Professor | 4 | 5% |
| Other | 12 | 14% |
| Unknown | 36 | 41% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 17 | 20% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 14 | 16% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 5% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 3% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 7 | 8% |
| Unknown | 40 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 12 February 2019.
All research outputs
#3,146,590
of 23,308,124 outputs
Outputs from Implementation Science
#680
of 1,728 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#75,172
of 438,921 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Implementation Science
#15
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,308,124 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,728 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,921 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.