You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
The Strong Black Woman Collective Theory: Determining the Prosocial Functions of Strength Regulation in Groups of Black Women Friends†
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Communication, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1093/joc/jqy065 |
| Authors |
Shardé M Davis, Tamara D Afifi |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 78 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 78 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 22% |
| Student > Master | 15 | 19% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 5% |
| Professor | 3 | 4% |
| Other | 7 | 9% |
| Unknown | 21 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 31 | 40% |
| Psychology | 10 | 13% |
| Arts and Humanities | 6 | 8% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 4% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 25 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 September 2019.
All research outputs
#15,558,163
of 23,124,001 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Communication
#979
of 1,231 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#265,078
of 437,281 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Communication
#10
of 10 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,124,001 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,231 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.5. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,281 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 10 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.