| Title |
Systematic Review and Pooled Estimates for the Diagnostic Accuracy of Serological Markers for Intestinal Ischemia
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
World Journal of Surgery, May 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00268-009-0074-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Nicholas J. Evennett, Maxim S. Petrov, Anubhav Mittal, John A. Windsor |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 111 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 2 | 2% |
| Chile | 1 | <1% |
| Denmark | 1 | <1% |
| United States | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 106 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 18 | 16% |
| Other | 13 | 12% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 13 | 12% |
| Professor > Associate Professor | 8 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 7% |
| Other | 28 | 25% |
| Unknown | 23 | 21% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 65 | 59% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 2 | 2% |
| Mathematics | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 8 | 7% |
| Unknown | 28 | 25% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 April 2024.
All research outputs
#2,920,893
of 25,738,558 outputs
Outputs from World Journal of Surgery
#368
of 4,616 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#9,315
of 104,502 outputs
Outputs of similar age from World Journal of Surgery
#2
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,738,558 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,616 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 104,502 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.