| Title |
Comparison of wall thickening and ejection fraction by cardiovascular magnetic resonance and echocardiography in acute myocardial infarction
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging, July 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1186/1532-429x-11-22 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Martha Nowosielski, Michael Schocke, Agnes Mayr, Kathrin Pedarnig, Gert Klug, Almut Köhler, Thomas Bartel, Silvana Müller, Thomas Trieb, Otmar Pachinger, Bernhard Metzler |
| Abstract |
The purpose of this study was to compare cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) and echocardiography (echo) in patients treated with primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) for acute myocardial infarction (AMI) with emphasis on the analysis of left ventricular function and left ventricular wall motion characteristics. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 50 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| New Zealand | 1 | 2% |
| Spain | 1 | 2% |
| Norway | 1 | 2% |
| Unknown | 47 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 13 | 26% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 7 | 14% |
| Other | 5 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 4 | 8% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 10 | 20% |
| Unknown | 8 | 16% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 27 | 54% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 8% |
| Computer Science | 3 | 6% |
| Engineering | 3 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 10 | 20% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 28 April 2022.
All research outputs
#4,961,876
of 25,864,668 outputs
Outputs from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#319
of 1,388 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,432
of 123,545 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Reviews in Diagnostic Imaging
#3
of 15 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,864,668 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 79th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,388 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 7.1. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 123,545 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 15 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.