| Title |
Standardizing methods to estimate population density: an example based on habituated and unhabituated spider monkeys
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biodiversity and Conservation, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10531-018-01696-2 |
| Authors |
Denise Spaan, Gabriel Ramos-Fernández, Colleen M. Schaffner, Sandra E. Smith-Aguilar, Braulio Pinacho-Guendulain, Filippo Aureli |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 33% |
| Mexico | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 1 | 33% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Scientists | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 51 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 14% |
| Researcher | 7 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 4 | 8% |
| Lecturer | 3 | 6% |
| Other | 10 | 20% |
| Unknown | 12 | 24% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Environmental Science | 13 | 25% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 24% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 6% |
| Social Sciences | 3 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 6 | 12% |
| Unknown | 12 | 24% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 January 2019.
All research outputs
#13,802,361
of 23,854,458 outputs
Outputs from Biodiversity and Conservation
#1,674
of 2,319 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#212,854
of 443,253 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biodiversity and Conservation
#25
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,854,458 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,319 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.6. This one is in the 27th percentile – i.e., 27% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 443,253 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 51% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.