| Title |
Feasibility of an alternative, physiologic, individualized open-lung approach to high-frequency oscillatory ventilation in children
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Intensive Care, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13613-019-0492-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Pauline de Jager, Tamara Kamp, Sandra K. Dijkstra, Johannes G. M. Burgerhof, Dick G. Markhorst, Martha A. Q. Curley, Ira M. Cheifetz, Martin C. J. Kneyber |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 21 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 24% |
| United Arab Emirates | 2 | 10% |
| Switzerland | 1 | 5% |
| Malaysia | 1 | 5% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 1 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 5% |
| Denmark | 1 | 5% |
| Spain | 1 | 5% |
| Uruguay | 1 | 5% |
| Other | 2 | 10% |
| Unknown | 5 | 24% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 11 | 52% |
| Scientists | 5 | 24% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 10% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 55 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 55 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 10 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 8 | 15% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 13% |
| Researcher | 5 | 9% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 7% |
| Other | 11 | 20% |
| Unknown | 10 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 23 | 42% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 13% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 4% |
| Business, Management and Accounting | 1 | 2% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 7% |
| Unknown | 17 | 31% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 10 February 2020.
All research outputs
#3,035,764
of 25,626,416 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#404
of 1,206 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#67,468
of 448,736 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#13
of 40 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,626,416 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,206 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.3. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 448,736 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 40 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.