↓ Skip to main content

Self-reported and routinely collected electronic healthcare resource-use data for trial-based economic evaluations: the current state of play in England and considerations for the future

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Research Methodology, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (80th percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (53rd percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
15 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
36 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
84 Mendeley
Title
Self-reported and routinely collected electronic healthcare resource-use data for trial-based economic evaluations: the current state of play in England and considerations for the future
Published in
BMC Medical Research Methodology, January 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12874-018-0649-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Matthew Franklin, Joanna Thorn

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 84 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 84 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 12 14%
Student > Master 11 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 6 7%
Student > Bachelor 5 6%
Student > Postgraduate 5 6%
Other 13 15%
Unknown 32 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 15 18%
Nursing and Health Professions 9 11%
Psychology 4 5%
Engineering 4 5%
Social Sciences 3 4%
Other 17 20%
Unknown 32 38%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 December 2020.
All research outputs
#3,689,214
of 23,124,001 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#572
of 2,036 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#83,559
of 438,322 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Research Methodology
#27
of 58 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,124,001 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 83rd percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,036 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,322 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 80% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 58 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.