| Title |
Aortic annulus sizing in stenotic bicommissural non-raphe-type bicuspid aortic valves: reconstructing a three-dimensional structure using only two hinge points
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Research in Cardiology, June 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00392-018-1295-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Antonio H. Frangieh, Jonathan Michel, Oliver Deutsch, Michael Joner, Costanza Pellegrini, Tobias Rheude, Sabine Bleiziffer, Albert Markus Kasel |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 113 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 34 | 30% |
| France | 8 | 7% |
| Canada | 4 | 4% |
| Brazil | 4 | 4% |
| Australia | 3 | 3% |
| Colombia | 3 | 3% |
| Italy | 3 | 3% |
| Mexico | 3 | 3% |
| Argentina | 2 | 2% |
| Other | 21 | 19% |
| Unknown | 28 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 79 | 70% |
| Scientists | 16 | 14% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 16 | 14% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 2 | 2% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 28 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 4 | 14% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 3 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 15 | 54% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 8 | 29% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 4% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 4% |
| Unknown | 17 | 61% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 75. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 25 January 2020.
All research outputs
#566,014
of 25,233,554 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Research in Cardiology
#22
of 955 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,479
of 335,128 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Research in Cardiology
#2
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,233,554 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 97th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 955 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.5. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 335,128 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its contemporaries.