| Title |
The relationship between nutritional intake and clinical outcomes in critically ill patients: results of an international multicenter observational study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Intensive Care Medicine, July 2009
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00134-009-1567-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Cathy Alberda, Leah Gramlich, Naomi Jones, Khursheed Jeejeebhoy, Andrew G. Day, Rupinder Dhaliwal, Daren K. Heyland |
| Abstract |
The objective of this study was to examine the relationship between the amount of energy and protein administered and clinical outcomes, and the extent to which pre-morbid nutritional status influenced this relationship. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 9 | 60% |
| Thailand | 1 | 7% |
| Ireland | 1 | 7% |
| United States | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 3 | 20% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 9 | 60% |
| Members of the public | 6 | 40% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 510 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 7 | 1% |
| Spain | 3 | <1% |
| Mexico | 3 | <1% |
| Italy | 2 | <1% |
| Colombia | 2 | <1% |
| Hong Kong | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | <1% |
| New Zealand | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 2 | <1% |
| Unknown | 487 | 95% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 80 | 16% |
| Researcher | 61 | 12% |
| Student > Bachelor | 57 | 11% |
| Other | 55 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 34 | 7% |
| Other | 121 | 24% |
| Unknown | 102 | 20% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 235 | 46% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 80 | 16% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 17 | 3% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 12 | 2% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 2% |
| Other | 42 | 8% |
| Unknown | 116 | 23% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 21. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 August 2018.
All research outputs
#1,497,700
of 22,661,413 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#1,228
of 4,967 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,793
of 109,769 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#1
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,661,413 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 93rd percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,967 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.5. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 109,769 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 95% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.