| Title |
Intraoperative fluid optimization using stroke volume variation in high risk surgical patients: results of prospective randomized study
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Critical Care, June 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1186/cc9070 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jan Benes, Ivan Chytra, Pavel Altmann, Marek Hluchy, Eduard Kasal, Roman Svitak, Richard Pradl, Martin Stepan |
| Abstract |
Stroke volume variation (SVV) is a good and easily obtainable predictor of fluid responsiveness, which can be used to guide fluid therapy in mechanically ventilated patients. During major abdominal surgery, inappropriate fluid management may result in occult organ hypoperfusion or fluid overload in patients with compromised cardiovascular reserves and thus increase postoperative morbidity. The aim of our study was to evaluate the influence of SVV guided fluid optimization on organ functions and postoperative morbidity in high risk patients undergoing major abdominal surgery. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 295 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 4 | 1% |
| Switzerland | 1 | <1% |
| Turkey | 1 | <1% |
| Italy | 1 | <1% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 282 | 96% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 55 | 19% |
| Other | 39 | 13% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 31 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 30 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 23 | 8% |
| Other | 76 | 26% |
| Unknown | 41 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 209 | 71% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 7 | 2% |
| Engineering | 6 | 2% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 5 | 2% |
| Neuroscience | 4 | 1% |
| Other | 12 | 4% |
| Unknown | 52 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 September 2017.
All research outputs
#3,415,350
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from Critical Care
#2,733
of 6,554 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#12,021
of 96,578 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Critical Care
#5
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 86th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,554 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 20.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 58% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 96,578 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.