| Title |
Effectiveness of stop smoking interventions among adults: protocol for an overview of systematic reviews and an updated systematic review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Systematic Reviews, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13643-018-0928-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Mona Hersi, Gregory Traversy, Brett D. Thombs, Andrew Beck, Becky Skidmore, Stéphane Groulx, Eddy Lang, Donna L. Reynolds, Brenda Wilson, Steven L. Bernstein, Peter Selby, Stephanie Johnson-Obaseki, Douglas Manuel, Smita Pakhale, Justin Presseau, Susan Courage, Brian Hutton, Beverley J. Shea, Vivian Welch, Matt Morrow, Julian Little, Adrienne Stevens |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 11 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 5 | 45% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 9% |
| Ireland | 1 | 9% |
| Unknown | 4 | 36% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 45% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 4 | 36% |
| Scientists | 2 | 18% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 275 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 275 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 36 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 33 | 12% |
| Researcher | 21 | 8% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 6% |
| Lecturer | 11 | 4% |
| Other | 35 | 13% |
| Unknown | 122 | 44% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 46 | 17% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 29 | 11% |
| Psychology | 15 | 5% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 8 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 8 | 3% |
| Other | 39 | 14% |
| Unknown | 130 | 47% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 November 2022.
All research outputs
#1,428,872
of 24,776,799 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#211
of 2,158 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,996
of 447,895 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#11
of 94 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,776,799 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,158 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.1. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 447,895 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 94 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.