| Title |
Defining loneliness in older adults: protocol for a systematic review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Systematic Reviews, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s13643-018-0935-y |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Razieh Bandari, Hamid Reza Khankeh, Farahnaz Mohammadi Shahboulaghi, Abbas Ebadi, Abbas Ali Keshtkar, Ali Montazeri |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 3 | 38% |
| United Kingdom | 2 | 25% |
| Saudi Arabia | 1 | 13% |
| Chile | 1 | 13% |
| United States | 1 | 13% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 5 | 63% |
| Scientists | 3 | 38% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 214 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 214 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Bachelor | 31 | 14% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 8% |
| Researcher | 17 | 8% |
| Student > Master | 16 | 7% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 11 | 5% |
| Other | 37 | 17% |
| Unknown | 85 | 40% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Nursing and Health Professions | 30 | 14% |
| Psychology | 28 | 13% |
| Social Sciences | 19 | 9% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 17 | 8% |
| Computer Science | 5 | 2% |
| Other | 17 | 8% |
| Unknown | 98 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 11. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 March 2020.
All research outputs
#2,857,956
of 23,124,001 outputs
Outputs from Systematic Reviews
#526
of 2,012 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#68,961
of 438,005 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Systematic Reviews
#34
of 91 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,124,001 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 87th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,012 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 12.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,005 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 91 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its contemporaries.