↓ Skip to main content

Plasma and urine neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin in septic versus non-septic acute kidney injury in critical illness

Overview of attention for article published in Intensive Care Medicine, December 2009
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (84th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (72nd percentile)

Citations

dimensions_citation
292 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
175 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
Title
Plasma and urine neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin in septic versus non-septic acute kidney injury in critical illness
Published in
Intensive Care Medicine, December 2009
DOI 10.1007/s00134-009-1724-9
Pubmed ID
Authors

Sean M. Bagshaw, Michael Bennett, Michael Haase, Anja Haase-Fielitz, Moritoki Egi, Hiroshi Morimatsu, Giuseppe D’amico, Donna Goldsmith, Prasad Devarajan, Rinaldo Bellomo

Abstract

Sepsis is the most common trigger for acute kidney injury (AKI) in critically ill patients. We sought to determine whether there are unique patterns to plasma and urine neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) in septic compared with non-septic AKI.

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 175 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
France 2 1%
Zimbabwe 1 <1%
Canada 1 <1%
Egypt 1 <1%
Denmark 1 <1%
Russia 1 <1%
United States 1 <1%
Unknown 167 95%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 28 16%
Student > Ph. D. Student 27 15%
Student > Postgraduate 17 10%
Other 13 7%
Student > Doctoral Student 12 7%
Other 48 27%
Unknown 30 17%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 112 64%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 3%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 4 2%
Nursing and Health Professions 3 2%
Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine 2 1%
Other 12 7%
Unknown 37 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 April 2019.
All research outputs
#4,144,328
of 22,661,413 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#2,132
of 4,967 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#23,434
of 165,039 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#6
of 22 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,661,413 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 80th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,967 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.5. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,039 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 22 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.