↓ Skip to main content

Adjuvant glycerol is not beneficial in experimental pneumococcal meningitis

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Infectious Diseases, March 2010
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

f1000
1 research highlight platform

Citations

dimensions_citation
20 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
26 Mendeley
citeulike
1 CiteULike
connotea
1 Connotea
Title
Adjuvant glycerol is not beneficial in experimental pneumococcal meningitis
Published in
BMC Infectious Diseases, March 2010
DOI 10.1186/1471-2334-10-84
Pubmed ID
Authors

Cornelia Blaser, Matthias Klein, Denis Grandgirard, Matthias Wittwer, Heikki Peltola, Michael Weigand, Uwe Koedel, Stephen L Leib

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 26 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Switzerland 1 4%
Unknown 25 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 4 15%
Student > Postgraduate 3 12%
Researcher 3 12%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 12%
Student > Doctoral Student 2 8%
Other 8 31%
Unknown 3 12%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 16 62%
Arts and Humanities 1 4%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 1 4%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 1 4%
Immunology and Microbiology 1 4%
Other 1 4%
Unknown 5 19%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 May 2010.
All research outputs
#15,241,259
of 22,661,413 outputs
Outputs from BMC Infectious Diseases
#4,428
of 7,632 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#77,326
of 94,908 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Infectious Diseases
#32
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,661,413 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,632 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.6. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,908 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.