| Title |
Microsatellitosis in Patients with Melanoma
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Annals of Surgical Oncology, November 2018
|
| DOI | 10.1245/s10434-018-7006-4 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Giorgos C. Karakousis, Phyllis A. Gimotty, Stanley P. Leong, Barbara A. Pockaj, Richard L. White, Cristina O’Donoghue, Andrew J. Sinnamon, Edmund K. Bartlett, Amylou C. Dueck, Bonnie E. Gould Rothberg, Jane L. Messina, John T. Vetto, Vernon K. Sondak, Schlomo Schneebaum, Mohammed Kashani-Sabet, Dale Han, Mark B. Faries, Jonathan S. Zager |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 12 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 5 | 42% |
| Belgium | 1 | 8% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 8% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 8% |
| Sweden | 1 | 8% |
| Mexico | 1 | 8% |
| Unknown | 2 | 17% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 33% |
| Scientists | 4 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 3 | 25% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 8% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 27 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 27 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 7 | 26% |
| Other | 6 | 22% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 2 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 7% |
| Professor | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 11% |
| Unknown | 6 | 22% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 44% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 3 | 11% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 4% |
| Decision Sciences | 1 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 9 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 13 July 2020.
All research outputs
#3,715,970
of 23,577,761 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#1,065
of 6,673 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#72,284
of 346,353 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Surgical Oncology
#20
of 118 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,577,761 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,673 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 84% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 346,353 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 79% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 118 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its contemporaries.