| Title |
Confidence Interval Criteria for Assessment of Dose Proportionality
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Pharmaceutical Research, October 2000
|
| DOI | 10.1023/a:1026451721686 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Brian P. Smith, Francois R. Vandenhende, Karl A. DeSante, Nagy A. Farid, Pamela A. Welch, John T. Callaghan, S. Thomas Forgue |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 50% |
| Scientists | 1 | 50% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 94 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Canada | 2 | 2% |
| United States | 2 | 2% |
| Japan | 1 | 1% |
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 88 | 94% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 25 | 27% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 21% |
| Other | 13 | 14% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 6% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 9 | 10% |
| Unknown | 17 | 18% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 24 | 26% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 20 | 21% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 12 | 13% |
| Mathematics | 9 | 10% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 4 | 4% |
| Other | 9 | 10% |
| Unknown | 16 | 17% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 January 2019.
All research outputs
#16,046,765
of 25,371,288 outputs
Outputs from Pharmaceutical Research
#2,292
of 2,982 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#35,326
of 38,859 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pharmaceutical Research
#13
of 13 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,371,288 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,982 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.5. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 38,859 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 13 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.