| Title |
Differences in objectively measured physical activity and sedentary behaviour between white Europeans and south Asians recruited from primary care: cross-sectional analysis of the PROPELS trial
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
BMC Public Health, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s12889-018-6341-5 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Gregory J. H. Biddle, Charlotte L. Edwardson, Alex V. Rowlands, Melanie J. Davies, Danielle H. Bodicoat, Wendy Hardeman, Helen Eborall, Stephen Sutton, Simon Griffin, Kamlesh Khunti, Thomas Yates |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 30 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 16 | 53% |
| Australia | 2 | 7% |
| Cyprus | 1 | 3% |
| New Zealand | 1 | 3% |
| Ireland | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 9 | 30% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Scientists | 13 | 43% |
| Members of the public | 12 | 40% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 5 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 247 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 247 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 30 | 12% |
| Unspecified | 27 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 27 | 11% |
| Researcher | 18 | 7% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 16 | 6% |
| Other | 37 | 15% |
| Unknown | 92 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 36 | 15% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 30 | 12% |
| Unspecified | 27 | 11% |
| Sports and Recreations | 20 | 8% |
| Psychology | 11 | 4% |
| Other | 22 | 9% |
| Unknown | 101 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 26. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 December 2021.
All research outputs
#1,456,817
of 25,366,663 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#1,637
of 17,009 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#33,932
of 451,345 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#42
of 306 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,366,663 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 94th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,009 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.6. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 451,345 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 306 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its contemporaries.