| Title |
Central venous pressure measurements improve the accuracy of leg raising-induced change in pulse pressure to predict fluid responsiveness
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Intensive Care Medicine, January 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00134-010-1755-2 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Karim Lakhal, Stephan Ehrmann, Isabelle Runge, Dalila Benzekri-Lefèvre, Annick Legras, Pierre François Dequin, Emmanuelle Mercier, Michel Wolff, Bernard Régnier, Thierry Boulain |
| Abstract |
Passive leg raising (PLR) is a maneuver performed to test the cardiac Frank-Starling mechanism. We assessed the influence of PLR-induced changes in preload on the performance of PLR-induced change in pulse pressure (Delta(PLR)PP) and cardiac output (Delta(PLR)CO) for fluid responsiveness prediction. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 110 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 2 | 2% |
| Brazil | 2 | 2% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Canada | 1 | <1% |
| Belgium | 1 | <1% |
| Spain | 1 | <1% |
| Greece | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 101 | 92% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 20 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 17 | 15% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 16 | 15% |
| Researcher | 13 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 10 | 9% |
| Other | 23 | 21% |
| Unknown | 11 | 10% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 84 | 76% |
| Engineering | 4 | 4% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 2% |
| Arts and Humanities | 2 | 2% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | <1% |
| Other | 4 | 4% |
| Unknown | 13 | 12% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 June 2010.
All research outputs
#15,241,259
of 22,661,413 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#3,992
of 4,967 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#134,720
of 165,120 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#26
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,661,413 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,967 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.5. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 165,120 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 9th percentile – i.e., 9% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 3rd percentile – i.e., 3% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.