↓ Skip to main content

Testing the efficacy of team teaching

Overview of attention for article published in Learning Environments Research, March 2007
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
45 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
91 Mendeley
Title
Testing the efficacy of team teaching
Published in
Learning Environments Research, March 2007
DOI 10.1007/s10984-007-9019-y
Authors

Dick M. Carpenter, Lindy Crawford, Ron Walden

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United States 2 2%
Colombia 1 1%
Canada 1 1%
Unknown 87 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer 14 15%
Student > Ph. D. Student 14 15%
Student > Master 14 15%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 11%
Professor > Associate Professor 7 8%
Other 17 19%
Unknown 15 16%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 22 24%
Business, Management and Accounting 10 11%
Arts and Humanities 7 8%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 5 5%
Psychology 4 4%
Other 25 27%
Unknown 18 20%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 January 2019.
All research outputs
#17,932,284
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Learning Environments Research
#208
of 279 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#81,746
of 93,303 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Learning Environments Research
#2
of 2 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 20th percentile – i.e., 20% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 279 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.3. This one is in the 14th percentile – i.e., 14% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 93,303 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 6th percentile – i.e., 6% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 2 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.