↓ Skip to main content

Artificial intelligence for determining systematic effects of laser scanners

Overview of attention for article published in GEM - International Journal on Geomathematics, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
2 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
7 Mendeley
Title
Artificial intelligence for determining systematic effects of laser scanners
Published in
GEM - International Journal on Geomathematics, January 2019
DOI 10.1007/s13137-019-0122-x
Authors

Karl-Rudolf Koch, Jan Martin Brockmann

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 7 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 7 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 2 29%
Researcher 2 29%
Unknown 3 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Engineering 2 29%
Chemistry 1 14%
Earth and Planetary Sciences 1 14%
Unknown 3 43%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 21 January 2019.
All research outputs
#21,392,871
of 23,885,338 outputs
Outputs from GEM - International Journal on Geomathematics
#16
of 19 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#379,165
of 443,576 outputs
Outputs of similar age from GEM - International Journal on Geomathematics
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,885,338 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 19 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.9. This one scored the same or higher as 3 of them.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 443,576 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 1st percentile – i.e., 1% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them