| Title |
Nodal FDG-PET/CT uptake influences outcome and relapse location among esophageal cancer patients submitted to chemotherapy or radiochemotherapy
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical and Translational Oncology, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12094-019-02038-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
E. Jimenez-Jimenez, P. Mateos, I. Ortiz, N. Aymar, R. Roncero, M. Gimenez, J. Pardo, S. Sabater |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 16 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 16 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Master | 5 | 31% |
| Researcher | 3 | 19% |
| Lecturer | 3 | 19% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 6% |
| Librarian | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 2 | 13% |
| Unknown | 1 | 6% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 69% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 6% |
| Computer Science | 1 | 6% |
| Engineering | 1 | 6% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 1 | 6% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 January 2020.
All research outputs
#18,664,348
of 23,124,001 outputs
Outputs from Clinical and Translational Oncology
#865
of 1,328 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#324,944
of 437,805 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical and Translational Oncology
#23
of 32 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,124,001 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,328 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.7. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,805 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 32 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 21st percentile – i.e., 21% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.