| Title |
Long-Term Follow-Up After Closure of Patent Foramen Ovale in Patients With Cryptogenic Embolism
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
JACC, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jacc.2018.10.061 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Jérôme Wintzer-Wehekind, Alberto Alperi, Christine Houde, Jean-Marc Côté, Lluis Asmarats, Mélanie Côté, Josep Rodés-Cabau |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 148 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 43 | 29% |
| Spain | 7 | 5% |
| United Kingdom | 6 | 4% |
| France | 6 | 4% |
| Argentina | 4 | 3% |
| Venezuela, Bolivarian Republic of | 4 | 3% |
| Brazil | 4 | 3% |
| Canada | 4 | 3% |
| Italy | 4 | 3% |
| Other | 30 | 20% |
| Unknown | 36 | 24% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 86 | 58% |
| Scientists | 28 | 19% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 27 | 18% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 7 | 5% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 69 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 69 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 13 | 19% |
| Other | 10 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 7% |
| Professor | 5 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 7% |
| Other | 8 | 12% |
| Unknown | 23 | 33% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 31 | 45% |
| Neuroscience | 3 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 3% |
| Linguistics | 2 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 1 | 1% |
| Other | 3 | 4% |
| Unknown | 27 | 39% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 108. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 17 June 2023.
All research outputs
#394,882
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from JACC
#934
of 17,066 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#8,739
of 453,225 outputs
Outputs of similar age from JACC
#21
of 170 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 17,066 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 30.0. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 94% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 453,225 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 98% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 170 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.