| Title |
Adapting the Interpersonal Quality in Family Planning care scale to assess patient perspectives on abortion care
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1186/s41687-018-0089-7 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Kyla Z. Donnelly, Christine Dehlendorf, Reiley Reed, Daniela Agusti, Rachel Thompson |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 6 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 2 | 33% |
| Brazil | 1 | 17% |
| Unknown | 3 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 33% |
| Scientists | 2 | 33% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 17% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 17% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 28 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 28 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 8 | 29% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 11% |
| Other | 2 | 7% |
| Student > Master | 2 | 7% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 4% |
| Other | 3 | 11% |
| Unknown | 9 | 32% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Social Sciences | 7 | 25% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 11% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 2 | 7% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 2 | 7% |
| Psychology | 2 | 7% |
| Other | 3 | 11% |
| Unknown | 9 | 32% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 5. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 September 2019.
All research outputs
#6,439,619
of 23,124,001 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
#118
of 508 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#135,601
of 438,136 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Patient-Reported Outcomes
#7
of 23 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,124,001 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 72nd percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 508 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 3.8. This one has done well, scoring higher than 76% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,136 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 23 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.