You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Molecular Imaging Visualizes Recruitment of Inflammatory Monocytes and Macrophages to the Injured Heart
|
---|---|
Published in |
Circulation Research, January 2019
|
DOI | 10.1161/circresaha.118.314030 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Gyu Seong Heo, Benjamin Kopecky, Deborah Sultan, Monica Ou, Guoshuai Feng, Geetika Bajpai, Xiaohui Zhang, Hannah Luehmann, Lisa Detering, Yi Su, Florian Leuschner, Christophe Combadière, Daniel Kreisel, Robert J Gropler, Steven L Brody, Yongjian Liu, Kory J Lavine |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 8 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Canada | 3 | 38% |
Spain | 1 | 13% |
Malaysia | 1 | 13% |
Brazil | 1 | 13% |
Unknown | 2 | 25% |
Demographic breakdown
Type | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Scientists | 4 | 50% |
Members of the public | 3 | 38% |
Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 13% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 90 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 90 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 22% |
Researcher | 14 | 16% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 9% |
Student > Master | 5 | 6% |
Other | 4 | 4% |
Other | 8 | 9% |
Unknown | 31 | 34% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Medicine and Dentistry | 16 | 18% |
Chemistry | 7 | 8% |
Immunology and Microbiology | 7 | 8% |
Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 6 | 7% |
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 6 | 7% |
Other | 11 | 12% |
Unknown | 37 | 41% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 7. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 19 March 2019.
All research outputs
#5,338,778
of 25,385,509 outputs
Outputs from Circulation Research
#2,004
of 7,667 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#114,934
of 446,872 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Circulation Research
#70
of 128 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,385,509 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 78th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 7,667 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.6. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 73% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,872 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 74% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 128 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.