You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
Title |
Clinical governance breakdown: Australian cases of wilful blindness and whistleblowing
|
---|---|
Published in |
Nursing Ethics, November 2017
|
DOI | 10.1177/0969733017731917 |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Sonja Cleary, Maxine Duke |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 81 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 81 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Student > Master | 13 | 16% |
Student > Bachelor | 11 | 14% |
Librarian | 4 | 5% |
Professor | 3 | 4% |
Lecturer | 3 | 4% |
Other | 10 | 12% |
Unknown | 37 | 46% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Nursing and Health Professions | 17 | 21% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 7% |
Psychology | 5 | 6% |
Social Sciences | 5 | 6% |
Business, Management and Accounting | 3 | 4% |
Other | 8 | 10% |
Unknown | 37 | 46% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 May 2020.
All research outputs
#8,184,747
of 24,535,155 outputs
Outputs from Nursing Ethics
#227
of 688 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#125,844
of 330,555 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nursing Ethics
#4
of 12 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,535,155 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 688 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 56% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 330,555 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 12 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its contemporaries.