↓ Skip to main content

Few Women on Boards: What’s Identity Got to Do With It?

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Business Ethics, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
26 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
91 Mendeley
Title
Few Women on Boards: What’s Identity Got to Do With It?
Published in
Journal of Business Ethics, January 2019
DOI 10.1007/s10551-019-04104-z
Authors

Lívia Markoczy, Sunny Li Sun, Jigao Zhu

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 91 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 91 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 12 13%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 10%
Student > Master 8 9%
Student > Bachelor 8 9%
Other 5 5%
Other 14 15%
Unknown 35 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Business, Management and Accounting 27 30%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 8 9%
Psychology 5 5%
Social Sciences 5 5%
Computer Science 3 3%
Other 6 7%
Unknown 37 41%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 22 January 2019.
All research outputs
#18,004,485
of 23,124,001 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Business Ethics
#2,472
of 2,960 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#305,173
of 437,805 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Business Ethics
#32
of 48 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,124,001 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 19th percentile – i.e., 19% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,960 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 9.1. This one is in the 12th percentile – i.e., 12% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,805 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 25th percentile – i.e., 25% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 48 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 29th percentile – i.e., 29% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.