↓ Skip to main content

PROSPECTIV—a pilot trial of a nurse-led psychoeducational intervention delivered in primary care to prostate cancer survivors: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial

Overview of attention for article published in BMJ Open, May 2014
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (52nd percentile)
  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source

Mentioned by

policy
1 policy source

Citations

dimensions_citation
12 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
213 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
PROSPECTIV—a pilot trial of a nurse-led psychoeducational intervention delivered in primary care to prostate cancer survivors: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial
Published in
BMJ Open, May 2014
DOI 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-005186
Pubmed ID
Authors

Eila Watson, Peter Rose, Emma Frith, Freddie Hamdy, David Neal, Christof Kastner, Simon Russell, Fiona M Walter, Sara Faithfull, Jane Wolstenholme, Rafael Perera, David Weller, Christine Campbell, Clare Wilkinson, Richard Neal, Prasanna Sooriakumaran, Hugh Butcher, Mike Matthews

Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 213 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 3 1%
Japan 1 <1%
Spain 1 <1%
Portugal 1 <1%
Unknown 207 97%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 24 11%
Student > Master 24 11%
Other 21 10%
Student > Bachelor 20 9%
Student > Ph. D. Student 19 9%
Other 52 24%
Unknown 53 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 42 20%
Nursing and Health Professions 37 17%
Computer Science 12 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 11 5%
Psychology 8 4%
Other 35 16%
Unknown 68 32%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 May 2019.
All research outputs
#8,535,472
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from BMJ Open
#14,038
of 25,588 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#79,613
of 240,011 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMJ Open
#156
of 247 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 25,588 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 18.2. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 240,011 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 52% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 247 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 33rd percentile – i.e., 33% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.