↓ Skip to main content

Spatially clustering de novo variants in CYFIP2, encoding the cytoplasmic FMRP interacting protein 2, cause intellectual disability and seizures

Overview of attention for article published in European Journal of Human Genetics, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (77th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (68th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
7 X users
wikipedia
1 Wikipedia page

Citations

dimensions_citation
47 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
59 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
Spatially clustering de novo variants in CYFIP2, encoding the cytoplasmic FMRP interacting protein 2, cause intellectual disability and seizures
Published in
European Journal of Human Genetics, January 2019
DOI 10.1038/s41431-018-0331-z
Pubmed ID
Authors

Markus Zweier, Anaïs Begemann, Kirsty McWalter, Megan T. Cho, Lucia Abela, Siddharth Banka, Bettina Behring, Andrea Berger, Chester W. Brown, Maryline Carneiro, Jiani Chen, Gregory M. Cooper, Candice R. Finnila, Maria J. Guillen Sacoto, Alex Henderson, Ulrike Hüffmeier, Pascal Joset, Bronwyn Kerr, Gaetan Lesca, Gloria S. Leszinski, John Henry McDermott, Meira R. Meltzer, Kristin G. Monaghan, Roya Mostafavi, Katrin Õunap, Barbara Plecko, Zöe Powis, Gabriela Purcarin, Tiia Reimand, Korbinian M. Riedhammer, John M. Schreiber, Deepa Sirsi, Klaas J. Wierenga, Monica H. Wojcik, Sorina M. Papuc, Katharina Steindl, Heinrich Sticht, Anita Rauch

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 7 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 59 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 59 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 17%
Researcher 8 14%
Student > Master 7 12%
Other 6 10%
Student > Postgraduate 6 10%
Other 9 15%
Unknown 13 22%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 11 19%
Neuroscience 9 15%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 12%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 7%
Engineering 2 3%
Other 10 17%
Unknown 16 27%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 8. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 September 2022.
All research outputs
#4,794,618
of 25,387,189 outputs
Outputs from European Journal of Human Genetics
#1,187
of 3,690 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#100,671
of 451,485 outputs
Outputs of similar age from European Journal of Human Genetics
#27
of 82 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,387,189 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 81st percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 3,690 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 10.4. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 451,485 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 82 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 68% of its contemporaries.