| Title |
Autoregulation of ventilation with neurally adjusted ventilatory assist on extracorporeal lung support
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Intensive Care Medicine, August 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00134-010-1982-6 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Christian Karagiannidis, Matthias Lubnow, Alois Philipp, Guenter A. J. Riegger, Christof Schmid, Michael Pfeifer, Thomas Mueller |
| Abstract |
Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) can support oxygenation and carbon dioxide elimination in severe lung failure. Usually it is accompanied by controlled mechanical ventilation. Neurally adjusted ventilatory assist (NAVA) is a new mode of ventilation triggered by the diaphragmatic electrical activity and controlled by the patient's respiratory centre, which may allow a close interaction between ventilation and extracorporeal perfusion. This pilot study intended to measure the physiologic ventilatory response in patients with severe lung failure treated with ECMO and NAVA. We hypothesized that the combination of both methods could automatically provide a protective ventilation with optimized blood gases. |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 79 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | 3% |
| Germany | 1 | 1% |
| France | 1 | 1% |
| Netherlands | 1 | 1% |
| Brazil | 1 | 1% |
| Spain | 1 | 1% |
| Unknown | 72 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 15 | 19% |
| Other | 9 | 11% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 11% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 8 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 9% |
| Other | 24 | 30% |
| Unknown | 7 | 9% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 48 | 61% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 6 | 8% |
| Engineering | 6 | 8% |
| Computer Science | 2 | 3% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 2 | 3% |
| Unknown | 13 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 November 2010.
All research outputs
#15,241,259
of 22,661,413 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#3,992
of 4,967 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#76,183
of 94,294 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#20
of 25 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,661,413 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,967 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 26.5. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 94,294 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 25 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 4th percentile – i.e., 4% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.