| Title |
Taxonomy of the order Bunyavirales: second update 2018
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Archives of Virology, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00705-018-04127-3 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Piet Maes, Scott Adkins, Sergey V. Alkhovsky, Tatjana Avšič-Županc, Matthew J. Ballinger, Dennis A. Bente, Martin Beer, Éric Bergeron, Carol D. Blair, Thomas Briese, Michael J. Buchmeier, Felicity J. Burt, Charles H. Calisher, Rémi N. Charrel, Il Ryong Choi, J. Christopher S. Clegg, Juan Carlos de la Torre, Xavier de Lamballerie, Joseph L. DeRisi, Michele Digiaro, Mike Drebot, Hideki Ebihara, Toufic Elbeaino, Koray Ergünay, Charles F. Fulhorst, Aura R. Garrison, George Fú Gāo, Jean-Paul J. Gonzalez, Martin H. Groschup, Stephan Günther, Anne-Lise Haenni, Roy A. Hall, Roger Hewson, Holly R. Hughes, Rakesh K. Jain, Miranda Gilda Jonson, Sandra Junglen, Boris Klempa, Jonas Klingström, Richard Kormelink, Amy J. Lambert, Stanley A. Langevin, Igor S. Lukashevich, Marco Marklewitz, Giovanni P. Martelli, Nicole Mielke-Ehret, Ali Mirazimi, Hans-Peter Mühlbach, Rayapati Naidu, Márcio Roberto Teixeira Nunes, Gustavo Palacios, Anna Papa, Janusz T. Pawęska, Clarence J. Peters, Alexander Plyusnin, Sheli R. Radoshitzky, Renato O. Resende, Víctor Romanowski, Amadou Alpha Sall, Maria S. Salvato, Takahide Sasaya, Connie Schmaljohn, Xiǎohóng Shí, Yukio Shirako, Peter Simmonds, Manuela Sironi, Jin-Won Song, Jessica R. Spengler, Mark D. Stenglein, Robert B. Tesh, Massimo Turina, Tàiyún Wèi, Anna E. Whitfield, Shyi-Dong Yeh, F. Murilo Zerbini, Yong-Zhen Zhang, Xueping Zhou, Jens H. Kuhn |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Finland | 1 | 20% |
| Unknown | 4 | 80% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 4 | 80% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 1 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 141 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 141 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 20 | 14% |
| Researcher | 19 | 13% |
| Student > Master | 18 | 13% |
| Other | 12 | 9% |
| Student > Bachelor | 8 | 6% |
| Other | 23 | 16% |
| Unknown | 41 | 29% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 27 | 19% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 26 | 18% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 21 | 15% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 6 | 4% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 3 | 2% |
| Other | 11 | 8% |
| Unknown | 47 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 05 April 2019.
All research outputs
#6,493,896
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Archives of Virology
#803
of 4,597 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#123,428
of 452,021 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archives of Virology
#5
of 41 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,597 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 452,021 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 41 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.