| Title |
Monitoring Matters: Examining the Potential of Locally-based Approaches
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biodiversity and Conservation, October 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s10531-005-8375-0 |
| Authors |
Finn Danielsen, Neil D. Burgess, Andrew Balmford |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 900 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 19 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 13 | 1% |
| South Africa | 6 | <1% |
| Germany | 4 | <1% |
| Brazil | 4 | <1% |
| India | 3 | <1% |
| Sweden | 3 | <1% |
| Spain | 3 | <1% |
| Portugal | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 26 | 3% |
| Unknown | 817 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 193 | 21% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 154 | 17% |
| Student > Master | 141 | 16% |
| Student > Bachelor | 70 | 8% |
| Other | 56 | 6% |
| Other | 172 | 19% |
| Unknown | 114 | 13% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 303 | 34% |
| Environmental Science | 290 | 32% |
| Social Sciences | 71 | 8% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 25 | 3% |
| Economics, Econometrics and Finance | 11 | 1% |
| Other | 57 | 6% |
| Unknown | 143 | 16% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 May 2022.
All research outputs
#2,379,927
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from Biodiversity and Conservation
#341
of 2,548 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#4,078
of 72,132 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biodiversity and Conservation
#2
of 19 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,548 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.2. This one has done well, scoring higher than 86% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 72,132 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 93% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 19 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 89% of its contemporaries.