| Title |
Potentialities of the virtual analysis of lithic refitting: case studies from the Middle and Upper Paleolithic
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s12520-019-00779-7 |
| Authors |
Davide Delpiano, Arianna Cocilova, Filippo Zangrossi, Marco Peresani |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 15 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Italy | 4 | 27% |
| Japan | 2 | 13% |
| United States | 1 | 7% |
| Guinea | 1 | 7% |
| United Kingdom | 1 | 7% |
| Portugal | 1 | 7% |
| Germany | 1 | 7% |
| Unknown | 4 | 27% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 12 | 80% |
| Scientists | 3 | 20% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 36 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 36 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 25% |
| Researcher | 5 | 14% |
| Professor | 5 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 1 | 3% |
| Lecturer | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 5 | 14% |
| Unknown | 10 | 28% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Arts and Humanities | 19 | 53% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 2 | 6% |
| Unspecified | 1 | 3% |
| Mathematics | 1 | 3% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 1 | 3% |
| Other | 0 | 0% |
| Unknown | 12 | 33% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 14. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 14 March 2022.
All research outputs
#2,345,617
of 23,666,535 outputs
Outputs from Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences
#158
of 832 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,838
of 441,213 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Archaeological and Anthropological Sciences
#9
of 26 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,666,535 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 832 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 13.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 441,213 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 87% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 26 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 69% of its contemporaries.