You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Tight junction defects in patients with atopic dermatitis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology, December 2010
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.jaci.2010.10.018 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Anna De Benedetto, Nicholas M. Rafaels, Laura Y. McGirt, Andrei I. Ivanov, Steve N. Georas, Chris Cheadle, Alan E. Berger, Kunzhong Zhang, Sadasivan Vidyasagar, Takeshi Yoshida, Mark Boguniewicz, Tissa Hata, Lynda C. Schneider, Jon M. Hanifin, Richard L. Gallo, Natalija Novak, Stephan Weidinger, Terri H. Beaty, Donald Y.M. Leung, Kathleen C. Barnes, Lisa A. Beck |
| Abstract |
Atopic dermatitis (AD) is characterized by dry skin and a hyperactive immune response to allergens, 2 cardinal features that are caused in part by epidermal barrier defects. Tight junctions (TJs) reside immediately below the stratum corneum and regulate the selective permeability of the paracellular pathway. |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Netherlands | 1 | 33% |
| Unknown | 2 | 67% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 67% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 1 | 33% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 376 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 2 | <1% |
| United States | 2 | <1% |
| Austria | 1 | <1% |
| Japan | 1 | <1% |
| Korea, Republic of | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 369 | 98% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 58 | 15% |
| Student > Master | 42 | 11% |
| Student > Bachelor | 39 | 10% |
| Researcher | 35 | 9% |
| Other | 27 | 7% |
| Other | 77 | 20% |
| Unknown | 98 | 26% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 106 | 28% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 51 | 14% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 37 | 10% |
| Immunology and Microbiology | 29 | 8% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 11 | 3% |
| Other | 34 | 9% |
| Unknown | 108 | 29% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 15. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 February 2024.
All research outputs
#2,457,807
of 25,837,817 outputs
Outputs from The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
#2,082
of 11,391 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#13,441
of 197,018 outputs
Outputs of similar age from The Journal of Allergy and Clinical Immunology
#16
of 72 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,837,817 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 90th percentile: it's in the top 10% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 11,391 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 17.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 197,018 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 91% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 72 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.