You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
A CASE OF MESENTERIC PANNICULITIS PRESENTED WITH AN ACUTE COURSE
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Nihon Rinsho Geka Gakkai Zasshi (Journal of Japan Surgical Association), January 1991
|
| DOI | 10.3919/ringe1963.52.592 |
| Authors |
Atsushi TAKAHASHI, Takashi BESSHO, Hidetane ONISHI, Hisashi SHINOHARA, Takashi KONDO, Hiroaki KURIHARA, Katsuhisa ONOGUCHI, SEKI Yasushi, IIO Hiroshi, Toshiharu FURUKAWA, Kosuke TOBITA, Miwako MUKAI |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Japan | 2 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 February 2019.
All research outputs
#15,517,312
of 25,373,627 outputs
Outputs from Nihon Rinsho Geka Gakkai Zasshi (Journal of Japan Surgical Association)
#81
of 178 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#48,147
of 59,481 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Nihon Rinsho Geka Gakkai Zasshi (Journal of Japan Surgical Association)
#3
of 4 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,373,627 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 178 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 2.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 53% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 59,481 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 4 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.