| Title |
Frontotemporal white matter changes in amyotrophic lateral sclerosis
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Journal of Neurology, March 2005
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00415-005-0646-x |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Sharon Abrahams, Laura H. Goldstein, John Suckling, Virginia Ng, Andy Simmons, Xavier Chitnis, Louise Atkins, Steve C. R. Williams, P. N. Leigh |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 161 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 3 | 2% |
| Germany | 1 | <1% |
| France | 1 | <1% |
| Unknown | 156 | 97% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 29 | 18% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 26 | 16% |
| Student > Master | 22 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 16 | 10% |
| Other | 13 | 8% |
| Other | 27 | 17% |
| Unknown | 28 | 17% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 42 | 26% |
| Neuroscience | 30 | 19% |
| Psychology | 25 | 16% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 11 | 7% |
| Engineering | 5 | 3% |
| Other | 14 | 9% |
| Unknown | 34 | 21% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 January 2016.
All research outputs
#7,472,947
of 22,846,662 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Neurology
#1,779
of 4,478 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#20,644
of 59,465 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Neurology
#12
of 30 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 22,846,662 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 4,478 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.0. This one is in the 41st percentile – i.e., 41% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 59,465 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 13th percentile – i.e., 13% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 30 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 10th percentile – i.e., 10% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.