Title |
Photoplethysmographic determination of the respiratory rate in acutely ill patients: validation of a new algorithm and implementation into a biomedical device
|
---|---|
Published in |
Annals of Intensive Care, January 2019
|
DOI | 10.1186/s13613-019-0485-z |
Pubmed ID | |
Authors |
Erwan L’Her, Quang-Thang N’Guyen, Victoire Pateau, Laetitia Bodenes, François Lellouche |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 76 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
Country | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Unknown | 76 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Researcher | 12 | 16% |
Student > Bachelor | 10 | 13% |
Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 12% |
Student > Master | 6 | 8% |
Student > Doctoral Student | 5 | 7% |
Other | 6 | 8% |
Unknown | 28 | 37% |
Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
---|---|---|
Engineering | 12 | 16% |
Medicine and Dentistry | 11 | 14% |
Computer Science | 8 | 11% |
Nursing and Health Professions | 4 | 5% |
Neuroscience | 3 | 4% |
Other | 9 | 12% |
Unknown | 29 | 38% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 July 2020.
All research outputs
#3,333,693
of 23,124,001 outputs
Outputs from Annals of Intensive Care
#406
of 1,055 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#80,779
of 438,136 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Annals of Intensive Care
#16
of 38 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,124,001 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,055 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 16.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 61% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,136 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 38 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 57% of its contemporaries.