↓ Skip to main content

Rhizosphere Microbiomes from Root Knot Nematode Non-infested Plants Suppress Nematode Infection

Overview of attention for article published in Microbial Ecology, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (81st percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
5 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
61 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
93 Mendeley
Title
Rhizosphere Microbiomes from Root Knot Nematode Non-infested Plants Suppress Nematode Infection
Published in
Microbial Ecology, January 2019
DOI 10.1007/s00248-019-01319-5
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dongmei Zhou, Hui Feng, Taruna Schuelke, Alejandro De Santiago, Qimeng Zhang, Jinfeng Zhang, Chuping Luo, Lihui Wei

Abstract

Root knot nematodes (RKN, Meloidogyne spp.) are serious pathogens of numerous crops worldwide. Understanding the roles plant rhizosphere soil microbiome play during RKN infection is very important. The current study aims at investigating the impacts of soil microbiome on the activity of RKN. In this study, the 16S rRNA genes of the bacterial communities from nematode-infested and non-infested rhizosphere soils from four different plants were sequenced on the Illumina Hi-Seq platform. The soil microbiome effects on RKN infection were tested in a greenhouse assay. The non-infested soils had more microbial diversity than the infested soils from all plant rhizospheres, and both soil types had exclusive microbial communities. The inoculation of the microbiomes from eggplant and cucumber non-infested soils to tomato plants significantly alleviated the RKN infection, while the microbiome from infested soil showed increased the RKN infection. Furthermore, bacteria Pseudomonas sp. and Bacillus sp. were screened out from non-infested eggplant soil and exhibited biocontrol activity to RKN on tomato. Our findings suggest that microbes may regulate RKN infection in plants and are involved in biocontrol of RKN.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 5 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 93 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 93 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 17 18%
Student > Master 15 16%
Researcher 12 13%
Student > Bachelor 8 9%
Student > Doctoral Student 7 8%
Other 7 8%
Unknown 27 29%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 42 45%
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 9 10%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 2%
Engineering 2 2%
Chemistry 2 2%
Other 4 4%
Unknown 32 34%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 9. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 January 2019.
All research outputs
#3,616,137
of 23,124,001 outputs
Outputs from Microbial Ecology
#324
of 2,075 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,509
of 438,136 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Microbial Ecology
#13
of 39 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,124,001 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 84th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,075 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.4. This one has done well, scoring higher than 83% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,136 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 81% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 39 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.