You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Computational Modeling of Open-Irrigated Electrodes for Radiofrequency Cardiac Ablation Including Blood Motion-Saline Flow Interaction
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
PLOS ONE, March 2016
|
| DOI | 10.1371/journal.pone.0150356 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Ana González-Suárez, Enrique Berjano, Jose M. Guerra, Luca Gerardo-Giorda |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 51 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Researcher | 12 | 24% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 9 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 7 | 14% |
| Student > Bachelor | 7 | 14% |
| Student > Doctoral Student | 2 | 4% |
| Other | 7 | 14% |
| Unknown | 7 | 14% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Engineering | 30 | 59% |
| Mathematics | 3 | 6% |
| Medicine and Dentistry | 3 | 6% |
| Materials Science | 3 | 6% |
| Physics and Astronomy | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 2 | 4% |
| Unknown | 9 | 18% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 January 2019.
All research outputs
#5,969,331
of 23,124,001 outputs
Outputs from PLOS ONE
#73,089
of 197,361 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#82,258
of 299,403 outputs
Outputs of similar age from PLOS ONE
#1,735
of 5,374 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,124,001 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 197,361 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 15.2. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 299,403 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 5,374 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 67% of its contemporaries.