↓ Skip to main content

“Encased brain” in hypertrophic pachymeningitis

Overview of attention for article published in Child's Nervous System, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (77th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
13 Mendeley
Title
“Encased brain” in hypertrophic pachymeningitis
Published in
Child's Nervous System, January 2019
DOI 10.1007/s00381-019-04061-y
Pubmed ID
Authors

Indar Kumar Sharawat, Arushi Gahlot Saini, Sameer Vyas, Naveen Sankhyan

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 13 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 13 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Doctoral Student 2 15%
Professor > Associate Professor 1 8%
Other 1 8%
Student > Bachelor 1 8%
Unknown 8 62%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 4 31%
Unknown 9 69%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 23 January 2019.
All research outputs
#15,506,738
of 23,124,001 outputs
Outputs from Child's Nervous System
#1,024
of 2,822 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#264,555
of 438,136 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Child's Nervous System
#16
of 70 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,124,001 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 32nd percentile – i.e., 32% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 2,822 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 1.9. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 62% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,136 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 39th percentile – i.e., 39% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 70 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done well, scoring higher than 77% of its contemporaries.