| Title |
Efficacy of Off-Label Topical Treatments for the Management of Androgenetic Alopecia: A Review
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Clinical Drug Investigation, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s40261-018-00743-8 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Aditya K. Gupta, Rachel R. Mays, Sarah G. Versteeg, Neil H. Shear, Vincent Piguet, Bianca Maria Piraccini |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 51 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 51 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Postgraduate | 6 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 5 | 10% |
| Student > Bachelor | 5 | 10% |
| Researcher | 5 | 10% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 4 | 8% |
| Other | 10 | 20% |
| Unknown | 16 | 31% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 12 | 24% |
| Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science | 10 | 20% |
| Unspecified | 3 | 6% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 2 | 4% |
| Environmental Science | 1 | 2% |
| Other | 4 | 8% |
| Unknown | 19 | 37% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 3. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 04 January 2023.
All research outputs
#8,013,698
of 24,083,187 outputs
Outputs from Clinical Drug Investigation
#308
of 995 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#161,885
of 445,154 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Clinical Drug Investigation
#6
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 24,083,187 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 44th percentile – i.e., 44% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 995 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 6.2. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 445,154 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 54% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.