↓ Skip to main content

Cultural Context of Family Religiosity/Spirituality among Korean-American Elderly Families

Overview of attention for article published in Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
3 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
40 Mendeley
Title
Cultural Context of Family Religiosity/Spirituality among Korean-American Elderly Families
Published in
Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology, January 2019
DOI 10.1007/s10823-019-09363-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Suk-Sun Kim, Yeoun Soo Kim-Godwin

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to explore the cultural context of family religiosity/spirituality among Korean-American elderly families, and how this changed after families immigrated to the USA. Fifty one first-generation Korean-Americans participated in one or two hour, in-depth interviews in Korean at a participant's home or church. These included 27 older adults and 24 family members living together or within a radius of one-hour transit time from their elders, residing in the Southeastern United States. A thematic and interpretive method was used to analyze transcribed interviews. Three themes were identified that explained the cultural context of family religiosity/spirituality: (a) traditional family religious rituals, (b) church oriented routines, and (c) family collectivism. The participants did not distinguish 'religiosity' and 'spirituality' during the interviews. The findings suggest that the family religiosity/spirituality of the participants was influenced by the traditional family religious values, which were shaped by Korean culture. The traditional religions of Shamanism, Buddhism, and Confucianism are prevalent in Asian countries. Thus, the findings of this study may help healthcare professionals identify the cultural contexts of spirituality/religiosity of Asian immigrant families in order to provide holistic care.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 40 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 40 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Lecturer 4 10%
Student > Doctoral Student 3 8%
Student > Ph. D. Student 3 8%
Other 2 5%
Student > Master 2 5%
Other 6 15%
Unknown 20 50%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Nursing and Health Professions 8 20%
Social Sciences 6 15%
Business, Management and Accounting 2 5%
Medicine and Dentistry 2 5%
Psychology 2 5%
Other 1 3%
Unknown 19 48%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 07 August 2019.
All research outputs
#15,558,163
of 23,124,001 outputs
Outputs from Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology
#140
of 196 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#265,779
of 438,136 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Journal of Cross-Cultural Gerontology
#1
of 1 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,124,001 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 22nd percentile – i.e., 22% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 196 research outputs from this source. They receive a mean Attention Score of 4.9. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,136 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 30th percentile – i.e., 30% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 1 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has scored higher than all of them