| Title |
The diagnosis and treatment of urogenital schistosomiasis in Italy in a retrospective cohort of immigrants from Sub-Saharan Africa
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Infection, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s15010-019-01270-0 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Marta Tilli, Federico Gobbi, Francesca Rinaldi, Jacopo Testa, Silvio Caligaris, Paola Magro, Dora Buonfrate, Monica Degani, Andrea Minervini, Marco Carini, Agostino Tuccio, Simone Sforza, Maurizio Gulletta, Francesco Castelli, Simone Agostini, Filippo Parretti, Joachim Richter, Piero Olliaro, Zeno Bisoffi, Alessandro Bartoloni, Lorenzo Zammarchi |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United Kingdom | 1 | 50% |
| Unknown | 1 | 50% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 2 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 60 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 60 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 8 | 13% |
| Researcher | 7 | 12% |
| Student > Master | 6 | 10% |
| Lecturer | 4 | 7% |
| Student > Bachelor | 3 | 5% |
| Other | 10 | 17% |
| Unknown | 22 | 37% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 15 | 25% |
| Social Sciences | 4 | 7% |
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 4 | 7% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 3 | 5% |
| Environmental Science | 2 | 3% |
| Other | 7 | 12% |
| Unknown | 25 | 42% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 01 September 2019.
All research outputs
#18,664,348
of 23,124,001 outputs
Outputs from Infection
#1,121
of 1,418 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#325,001
of 438,136 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Infection
#9
of 17 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,124,001 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,418 research outputs from this source. They typically receive more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 8.5. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 438,136 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 17 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 17th percentile – i.e., 17% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.