You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output.
Click here to find out more.
X Demographics
Mendeley readers
Attention Score in Context
| Title |
Global warming, elevational ranges and the vulnerability of tropical biota
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Biological Conservation, January 2011
|
| DOI | 10.1016/j.biocon.2010.10.010 |
| Authors |
William F. Laurance, D. Carolina Useche, Luke P. Shoo, Sebastian K. Herzog, Michael Kessler, Federico Escobar, Gunnar Brehm, Jan C. Axmacher, I-Ching Chen, Lucrecia Arellano Gámez, Peter Hietz, Konrad Fiedler, Tomasz Pyrcz, Jan Wolf, Christopher L. Merkord, Catherine Cardelus, Andrew R. Marshall, Claudine Ah-Peng, Gregory H. Aplet, M. del Coro Arizmendi, William J. Baker, John Barone, Carsten A. Brühl, Rainer W. Bussmann, Daniele Cicuzza, Gerald Eilu, Mario E. Favila, Andreas Hemp, Claudia Hemp, Jürgen Homeier, Johanna Hurtado, Jill Jankowski, Gustavo Kattán, Jürgen Kluge, Thorsten Krömer, David C. Lees, Marcus Lehnert, John T. Longino, Jon Lovett, Patrick H. Martin, Bruce D. Patterson, Richard G. Pearson, Kelvin S.-H. Peh, Barbara Richardson, Michael Richardson, Michael J. Samways, Feyera Senbeta, Thomas B. Smith, Timothy M.A. Utteridge, James E. Watkins, Rohan Wilson, Stephen E. Williams, Chris D. Thomas |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Singapore | 1 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 1 | 100% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 785 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Brazil | 16 | 2% |
| United States | 13 | 2% |
| United Kingdom | 5 | <1% |
| Germany | 4 | <1% |
| South Africa | 4 | <1% |
| Mexico | 3 | <1% |
| Colombia | 3 | <1% |
| Australia | 3 | <1% |
| Panama | 2 | <1% |
| Other | 20 | 3% |
| Unknown | 712 | 91% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 155 | 20% |
| Researcher | 140 | 18% |
| Student > Master | 104 | 13% |
| Student > Bachelor | 79 | 10% |
| Professor | 43 | 5% |
| Other | 168 | 21% |
| Unknown | 96 | 12% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Agricultural and Biological Sciences | 403 | 51% |
| Environmental Science | 171 | 22% |
| Earth and Planetary Sciences | 35 | 4% |
| Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology | 12 | 2% |
| Social Sciences | 11 | 1% |
| Other | 34 | 4% |
| Unknown | 119 | 15% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 4. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 20 July 2021.
All research outputs
#8,262,193
of 26,017,215 outputs
Outputs from Biological Conservation
#4,160
of 6,902 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#56,851
of 195,911 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Biological Conservation
#33
of 60 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 26,017,215 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 67th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 6,902 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 24.7. This one is in the 37th percentile – i.e., 37% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 195,911 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 60 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 43rd percentile – i.e., 43% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.