↓ Skip to main content

Effect of calories-only vs physical activity calorie expenditure labeling on lunch calories purchased in worksite cafeterias

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Public Health, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (82nd percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (66th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
twitter
4 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
13 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
89 Mendeley
Title
Effect of calories-only vs physical activity calorie expenditure labeling on lunch calories purchased in worksite cafeterias
Published in
BMC Public Health, January 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12889-019-6433-x
Pubmed ID
Authors

Anthony J. Viera, Ziya Gizlice, Laura Tuttle, Emily Olsson, Julie Gras-Najjar, Derek Hales, Laura Linnan, Feng-Chang Lin, Seth M. Noar, Alice Ammerman

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 4 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 89 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 89 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 18 20%
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 10%
Researcher 7 8%
Professor 5 6%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 4 4%
Other 12 13%
Unknown 34 38%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Psychology 11 12%
Nursing and Health Professions 10 11%
Social Sciences 8 9%
Medicine and Dentistry 7 8%
Sports and Recreations 4 4%
Other 10 11%
Unknown 39 44%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 10. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 29 September 2021.
All research outputs
#3,241,350
of 23,124,001 outputs
Outputs from BMC Public Health
#3,698
of 15,080 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#78,398
of 437,851 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Public Health
#104
of 306 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,124,001 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 85th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 15,080 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.0. This one has done well, scoring higher than 75% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,851 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 82% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 306 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 66% of its contemporaries.