| Title |
Clinical examination: a trigger but not a substitute for hemodynamic evaluation
|
|---|---|
| Published in |
Intensive Care Medicine, January 2019
|
| DOI | 10.1007/s00134-019-05538-9 |
| Pubmed ID | |
| Authors |
Daniel De Backer, Antoine Vieillard-Baron |
X Demographics
The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 164 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| United States | 12 | 7% |
| Mexico | 10 | 6% |
| Spain | 7 | 4% |
| Colombia | 6 | 4% |
| Ecuador | 6 | 4% |
| Brazil | 6 | 4% |
| Netherlands | 5 | 3% |
| Italy | 5 | 3% |
| United Kingdom | 4 | 2% |
| Other | 41 | 25% |
| Unknown | 62 | 38% |
Demographic breakdown
| Type | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Members of the public | 113 | 69% |
| Practitioners (doctors, other healthcare professionals) | 32 | 20% |
| Scientists | 14 | 9% |
| Science communicators (journalists, bloggers, editors) | 5 | 3% |
Mendeley readers
The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 30 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.
Geographical breakdown
| Country | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Unknown | 30 | 100% |
Demographic breakdown
| Readers by professional status | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Other | 5 | 17% |
| Student > Postgraduate | 4 | 13% |
| Researcher | 4 | 13% |
| Student > Ph. D. Student | 3 | 10% |
| Student > Master | 3 | 10% |
| Other | 3 | 10% |
| Unknown | 8 | 27% |
| Readers by discipline | Count | As % |
|---|---|---|
| Medicine and Dentistry | 19 | 63% |
| Veterinary Science and Veterinary Medicine | 1 | 3% |
| Social Sciences | 1 | 3% |
| Nursing and Health Professions | 1 | 3% |
| Unknown | 8 | 27% |
Attention Score in Context
This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 91. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 06 December 2022.
All research outputs
#474,584
of 25,793,330 outputs
Outputs from Intensive Care Medicine
#419
of 5,494 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#10,734
of 449,479 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Intensive Care Medicine
#9
of 97 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,793,330 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 98th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,494 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 29.7. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 92% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,479 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 97% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 97 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 90% of its contemporaries.