↓ Skip to main content

How to effectively obtain informed consent in trauma patients: a systematic review

Overview of attention for article published in BMC Medical Ethics, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 25% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (85th percentile)
  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (70th percentile)

Mentioned by

blogs
1 blog
policy
1 policy source
twitter
3 X users
facebook
1 Facebook page

Citations

dimensions_citation
31 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
153 Mendeley
Title
How to effectively obtain informed consent in trauma patients: a systematic review
Published in
BMC Medical Ethics, January 2019
DOI 10.1186/s12910-019-0347-0
Pubmed ID
Authors

Yen-Ko Lin, Kuan-Ting Liu, Chao-Wen Chen, Wei-Che Lee, Chia-Ju Lin, Leiyu Shi, Yin-Chun Tien

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 153 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 153 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Bachelor 14 9%
Other 13 8%
Student > Master 12 8%
Student > Doctoral Student 10 7%
Student > Ph. D. Student 10 7%
Other 28 18%
Unknown 66 43%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 35 23%
Nursing and Health Professions 23 15%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 3 2%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 3 2%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 2 1%
Other 18 12%
Unknown 69 45%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 12. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 09 October 2023.
All research outputs
#2,950,256
of 25,287,709 outputs
Outputs from BMC Medical Ethics
#306
of 1,094 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#65,215
of 450,406 outputs
Outputs of similar age from BMC Medical Ethics
#7
of 20 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,287,709 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done well and is in the 88th percentile: it's in the top 25% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,094 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 14.7. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 72% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 450,406 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done well, scoring higher than 85% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 20 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 70% of its contemporaries.