↓ Skip to main content

How structural adjustment programs affect inequality: A disaggregated analysis of IMF conditionality, 1980–2014

Overview of attention for article published in Social Science Research, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • In the top 5% of all research outputs scored by Altmetric
  • One of the highest-scoring outputs from this source (#6 of 1,406)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (99th percentile)
  • High Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (96th percentile)

Mentioned by

news
13 news outlets
blogs
3 blogs
policy
1 policy source
twitter
453 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
83 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
162 Mendeley
You are seeing a free-to-access but limited selection of the activity Altmetric has collected about this research output. Click here to find out more.
Title
How structural adjustment programs affect inequality: A disaggregated analysis of IMF conditionality, 1980–2014
Published in
Social Science Research, January 2019
DOI 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2019.01.001
Pubmed ID
Authors

Timon Forster, Alexander E Kentikelenis, Bernhard Reinsberg, Thomas H Stubbs, Lawrence P King

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 453 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 162 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Germany 1 <1%
Unknown 161 99%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 28 17%
Student > Bachelor 21 13%
Researcher 13 8%
Student > Master 10 6%
Student > Doctoral Student 9 6%
Other 31 19%
Unknown 50 31%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Social Sciences 45 28%
Economics, Econometrics and Finance 23 14%
Business, Management and Accounting 9 6%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 8 5%
Arts and Humanities 5 3%
Other 18 11%
Unknown 54 33%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 490. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 27 November 2023.
All research outputs
#54,578
of 25,765,370 outputs
Outputs from Social Science Research
#6
of 1,406 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#1,075
of 449,307 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Social Science Research
#1
of 31 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,765,370 research outputs across all sources so far. Compared to these this one has done particularly well and is in the 99th percentile: it's in the top 5% of all research outputs ever tracked by Altmetric.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,406 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 21.8. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 449,307 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 99% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 31 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has done particularly well, scoring higher than 96% of its contemporaries.