↓ Skip to main content

Evaluation of the US Food and Drug Administration Sentinel Analysis Tools Using a Comparator with a Different Indication: Comparing the Rates of Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Warfarin and Statin Users

Overview of attention for article published in Pharmaceutical Medicine, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

Mentioned by

twitter
1 X user

Citations

dimensions_citation
7 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
8 Mendeley
Title
Evaluation of the US Food and Drug Administration Sentinel Analysis Tools Using a Comparator with a Different Indication: Comparing the Rates of Gastrointestinal Bleeding in Warfarin and Statin Users
Published in
Pharmaceutical Medicine, January 2019
DOI 10.1007/s40290-018-00265-w
Pubmed ID
Authors

Ryan M. Carnahan, Joshua J. Gagne, Christian Hampp, Charles E. Leonard, Sengwee Toh, Candace C. Fuller, Sean Hennessy, Laura Hou, Noelle M. Cocoros, Genna Panucci, Tiffany Woodworth, Austin Cosgrove, Aarthi Iyer, Elizabeth A. Chrischilles

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profile of 1 X user who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 8 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 8 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Master 3 38%
Student > Ph. D. Student 1 13%
Lecturer > Senior Lecturer 1 13%
Researcher 1 13%
Unknown 2 25%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 3 38%
Pharmacology, Toxicology and Pharmaceutical Science 1 13%
Unknown 4 50%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 1. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 24 January 2019.
All research outputs
#18,664,348
of 23,124,001 outputs
Outputs from Pharmaceutical Medicine
#120
of 151 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#324,944
of 437,805 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Pharmaceutical Medicine
#2
of 3 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 23,124,001 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 11th percentile – i.e., 11% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 151 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.9. This one is in the 7th percentile – i.e., 7% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 437,805 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 15th percentile – i.e., 15% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 3 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one.