↓ Skip to main content

Orthologous CRISPR/Cas9 systems for specific and efficient degradation of covalently closed circular DNA of hepatitis B virus

Overview of attention for article published in Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, January 2019
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Good Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age (71st percentile)
  • Above-average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age and source (60th percentile)

Mentioned by

twitter
3 X users
patent
1 patent

Citations

dimensions_citation
58 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
42 Mendeley
Title
Orthologous CRISPR/Cas9 systems for specific and efficient degradation of covalently closed circular DNA of hepatitis B virus
Published in
Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences, January 2019
DOI 10.1007/s00018-019-03021-8
Pubmed ID
Authors

Dmitry Kostyushev, Sergey Brezgin, Anastasiya Kostyusheva, Dmitry Zarifyan, Irina Goptar, Vladimir Chulanov

Abstract

Covalently closed circular DNA (cccDNA) of hepatitis B virus (HBV) is the major cause of viral persistence and chronic hepatitis B. CRISPR/Cas9 nucleases can specifically target HBV cccDNA for decay, but off-target effects of nucleases in the human genome limit their clinical utility. CRISPR/Cas9 systems from four different species were co-expressed in cell lines with guide RNAs targeting conserved regions of the HBV genome. CRISPR/Cas9 systems from Streptococcus pyogenes (Sp) and Streptococcus thermophilus (St) targeting conserved regions of the HBV genome blocked HBV replication and, most importantly, resulted in degradation of over 90% of HBV cccDNA by 6 days post-transfection. Degradation of HBV cccDNA was impaired by inhibition of non-homologous end-joining pathway and resulted in an erroneous repair of HBV cccDNA. HBV cccDNA methylation also affected antiviral activity of CRISPR/Cas9. Single-nucleotide HBV genetic variants did not impact anti-HBV activity of St CRISPR/Cas9, suggesting its utility in targeting many HBV variants. However, two or more mismatches impaired or blocked CRISPR/Cas9 activity, indicating that host DNA will not likely be targeted. Deep sequencing revealed that Sp CRISPR/Cas9 induced off-target mutagenesis, whereas St CRISPR/Cas9 had no effect on the host genome. St CRISPR/Cas9 system represents the safest system with high anti-HBV activity.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 3 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 42 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
Unknown 42 100%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Researcher 9 21%
Student > Bachelor 8 19%
Student > Ph. D. Student 7 17%
Professor 3 7%
Unspecified 1 2%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 11 26%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology 16 38%
Medicine and Dentistry 6 14%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 4 10%
Engineering 2 5%
Chemistry 2 5%
Other 3 7%
Unknown 9 21%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 6. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 08 March 2023.
All research outputs
#6,516,271
of 25,436,226 outputs
Outputs from Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences
#1,698
of 5,887 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#126,321
of 446,963 outputs
Outputs of similar age from Cellular and Molecular Life Sciences
#20
of 51 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,436,226 research outputs across all sources so far. This one has received more attention than most of these and is in the 74th percentile.
So far Altmetric has tracked 5,887 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a little more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 5.8. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its peers.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 446,963 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 71% of its contemporaries.
We're also able to compare this research output to 51 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one has gotten more attention than average, scoring higher than 60% of its contemporaries.