↓ Skip to main content

Suicidal Ideation during Antidepressant Treatment

Overview of attention for article published in CNS Drugs, August 2012
Altmetric Badge

About this Attention Score

  • Average Attention Score compared to outputs of the same age

Mentioned by

twitter
2 X users

Citations

dimensions_citation
19 Dimensions

Readers on

mendeley
54 Mendeley
Title
Suicidal Ideation during Antidepressant Treatment
Published in
CNS Drugs, August 2012
DOI 10.2165/11589420-000000000-00000
Pubmed ID
Authors

Nader Perroud

Abstract

Suicidal thoughts during antidepressant treatment have recently been the focus of several candidate gene and genome-wide association studies. Although the clinical risk factors for such events are well known, unfortunately they do not help to predict who will have a suicidal event during antidepressant treatment and who will not. Pharmacogenomic studies have therefore attempted to use genetic variants to predict individual susceptibility to treatment-related suicidal ideation. In this perspective, several genetic predictors have been highlighted, the majority of which relate to common mechanisms of antidepressant action: genes involved in the neurotrophic and synaptic plasticity systems (CREB1, and BDNF and its receptor NTRK2), noradrenergic system (ADRA2A), glutamatergic system (GRIA3, GRIK2 and GDA), inflammatory and hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis systems (IL28RA and FKBP5) and in other brain functions (PAPLN, APOO, KCNIP4 and ELP3). Although some of these genes may be of interest in predicting antidepressant-induced suicidal ideation, they still need to be validated in better phenotypically designed samples. Several methodological factors are indeed responsible for the problems involved in implicating these findings in the causation of a clinically relevant phenotype. These include discrepancies between studies in defining phenotypes, with several different thresholds used to establish significant suicidal ideation; the use of scales not truly designed to measure suicidal ideation; and the paucity of true suicidal events (suicide attempts and/or completion) in pharmacogenomic studies. In conclusion, pharmacogenomic studies are far from fulfilling their promise. There is a need for future pharmacogenetic studies targeting events that are clinically significant in order to find associated variants that will help clinicians to improve their treatment strategies. While awaiting these genetic predictors, clinicians need to bear in mind that all studies in this field support a beneficial effect of antidepressants on suicidal ideation. This should therefore encourage them to prescribe antidepressant medication even in patients with suicidal ideation.

X Demographics

X Demographics

The data shown below were collected from the profiles of 2 X users who shared this research output. Click here to find out more about how the information was compiled.
Mendeley readers

Mendeley readers

The data shown below were compiled from readership statistics for 54 Mendeley readers of this research output. Click here to see the associated Mendeley record.

Geographical breakdown

Country Count As %
United Kingdom 1 2%
United States 1 2%
Unknown 52 96%

Demographic breakdown

Readers by professional status Count As %
Student > Ph. D. Student 9 17%
Student > Bachelor 7 13%
Student > Master 6 11%
Researcher 5 9%
Professor > Associate Professor 4 7%
Other 8 15%
Unknown 15 28%
Readers by discipline Count As %
Medicine and Dentistry 14 26%
Psychology 6 11%
Neuroscience 5 9%
Agricultural and Biological Sciences 3 6%
Nursing and Health Professions 2 4%
Other 7 13%
Unknown 17 31%
Attention Score in Context

Attention Score in Context

This research output has an Altmetric Attention Score of 2. This is our high-level measure of the quality and quantity of online attention that it has received. This Attention Score, as well as the ranking and number of research outputs shown below, was calculated when the research output was last mentioned on 02 January 2012.
All research outputs
#16,580,157
of 25,374,647 outputs
Outputs from CNS Drugs
#1,133
of 1,388 outputs
Outputs of similar age
#120,164
of 187,950 outputs
Outputs of similar age from CNS Drugs
#494
of 541 outputs
Altmetric has tracked 25,374,647 research outputs across all sources so far. This one is in the 34th percentile – i.e., 34% of other outputs scored the same or lower than it.
So far Altmetric has tracked 1,388 research outputs from this source. They typically receive a lot more attention than average, with a mean Attention Score of 11.6. This one is in the 18th percentile – i.e., 18% of its peers scored the same or lower than it.
Older research outputs will score higher simply because they've had more time to accumulate mentions. To account for age we can compare this Altmetric Attention Score to the 187,950 tracked outputs that were published within six weeks on either side of this one in any source. This one is in the 35th percentile – i.e., 35% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.
We're also able to compare this research output to 541 others from the same source and published within six weeks on either side of this one. This one is in the 8th percentile – i.e., 8% of its contemporaries scored the same or lower than it.